Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Engine

Ford Sigma engine

Automotive Engines

The Ford Sigma is a small straight-four petrol engine that Ford Motor Company introduced in 1995 for its smaller models. It first appeared as the Zetec-S, then the Zetec-SE and later the Duratec, and its last upgrade is the Duratec Ti-VCT with twin independent variable camshaft timing. It was meant to replace the older HCS engine, a derivative of the Kent unit, and the smaller CVH units. Development was shared between Ford, Mazda and Yamaha, with production at the Valencia engine plant and the 1.7 litre blocks cast by Yamaha in Japan. It first appeared in the Mk4 Fiesta and the Mazda 121 as a 1.2 litre engine, with 1.4, 1.6 and 1.7 litre versions following. A cheaper single-camshaft 8-valve Brazilian version is known as the RoCam. The Sigma stayed in production at Bridgend until September 2020 and is the basis of the 1.5 and 1.6 litre EcoBoost fours.

Facts
Year
1995 1
Cylinder Count
4 1
Classification
Configuration
Inline 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Source Ford Sigma engine (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Ford Sigma engine (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Ford Sigma engine (Wikipedia)Lead
Quote, Lead
The Ford Sigma is a small straight four automobile engine introduced in 1995 by Ford Motor Company.
Sources
1. Ford Sigma engine (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    The Ford Sigma is a small straight four automobile engine introduced in 1995 by Ford Motor Company.
  • Part Of: Ford Fiesta (fourth generation, Mk4), Introduction and production
    The engine first appeared in the Mk4 Ford Fiesta and the virtually identical Mazda 121 in 1.2 L (1,242 cc) capacity
  • In Group: Road Car Engines of Europe and Japan, Introduction and production
    Production of the Zetec-SE was carried out in the Ford Valencia Engine Plant, with Yamaha building the 1.7 L engine blocks in Japan.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.