The Dodge Rampage Concept was a concept pickup truck that Dodge first showed at the 2006 Chicago Auto Show, reusing the name of the small front-drive Rampage sold in the early 1980s. It was as wide as the Dodge Ram of the time and larger than its predecessor, and exterior designer Scott Krugger described it as a truck for people who are not into trucks. The concept could accommodate a 5.7 liter Hemi engine with Chrysler's Multi-Displacement System, and like its namesake it was front-wheel drive, unusual for a pickup. It had flared fenders and 22-inch aluminum wheels, borrowed the Stow n Go seating of Chrysler minivans, and combined a retractable rear window and midgate with a flat cargo area under the bed and an integrated loading ramp.
Facts
Engine Class Connections
Exemplifies
Source Dodge Rampage Concept (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Dodge Rampage Concept (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Dodge Rampage Concept (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
The Dodge Rampage was a concept pickup truck created by Dodge that shared a name with a previous production vehicle
Sources
1. Dodge Rampage Concept (Wikipedia)
Lead
The Rampage Concept was first introduced at the 2006 Chicago Auto Show.
Lead, body style
The Dodge Rampage was a concept pickup truck created by Dodge
Lead, manufacturer
The Dodge Rampage was a concept pickup truck created by Dodge that shared a name with a previous production vehicle
Infobox: engine
Hemi V8
Of Make: Dodge, Lead, maker
The Dodge Rampage was a concept pickup truck created by Dodge that shared a name with a previous production vehicle
In Group: Pickup Trucks, Lead, kind of vehicle
The Dodge Rampage was a concept pickup truck created by Dodge that shared a name with a previous production vehicle
Exemplifies: Automobile Transport, Lead, kind of vehicle
The Dodge Rampage was a concept pickup truck created by Dodge that shared a name with a previous production vehicle
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.