Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Vickers 6-ton

Automobiles

The Vickers 6-ton tank, also called the Vickers Mark E or the Six-tonner, was a British light tank designed in 1928 as a private venture at Vickers by a team that included the tank designers John Valentine Carden and Vivian Loyd. The British Army did not adopt it, but several other armed forces bought it, the Soviet Union built it under licence as the T-26, and it was the direct predecessor of the Polish 7TP. It came in two versions, the Type A with two machine-gun turrets and the Type B with a single two-man turret carrying a machine gun and a short 47 mm 3-pounder gun. An Armstrong Siddeley engine of 80 to 95 horsepower gave a road speed of 22 mph, and the suspension patented by Carden gave good cross-country performance for its time.

Facts
Year
1928 1
Top Speed (km/h)
35.4 1
Engine
Armstrong Siddeley engine of 80 to 95 horsepower 1
Comparison
Body Style
Armoured Fighting Vehicle 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Source Vickers 6-ton (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Vickers 6-ton (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Vickers 6-ton (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturer
Quote, Lead, manufacturer
was a British light tank designed in 1928 in a private project at Vickers

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Vickers 6-ton (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturer
Quote, Lead, manufacturer
was a British light tank designed in 1928 in a private project at Vickers
Sources
1. Vickers 6-ton (Wikipedia)
  • History, first build
    The first Mark E was built in 1928
  • Lead
    was a British light tank
  • History, power
    The power was provided by an Armstrong Siddeley engine of 80-95 horsepower
  • History, road speed
    a top speed of 22 mph (35 km/h) on roads
  • Lead, manufacturer
    was a British light tank designed in 1928 in a private project at Vickers
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.