Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

1992 Mercury Capri

Automobiles

The 1992 Capri was sold with minimal revisions in base and XR2 trims, the base equipped with a 100 horsepower Mazda 1.6 liter DOHC inline four and the XR2 with a turbocharged version rated at 132 horsepower. The XR2 received standard three spoke 15 inch alloy wheels for 1992. A five speed manual was standard, with a four speed automatic available on base trim Capris. The third generation Capri was a front wheel drive 2+2 roadster derived from the Australian Ford Laser.

Facts
Comparison
Body Style
Convertible 1
Year
1992 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Followed By

Model Year Of

Of Make

Preceded By

In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Wikipedia: Ford AustraliaLead paragraph, ownershiptier 2
Quote, Lead paragraph, ownership
is the Australian subsidiary of United States

Built By

Also in Business Atlas: the company or plant that built this subject.

Source Wikipedia: Mercury CapriThird generation (1991–1994)tier 2
Quote, Third generation (1991–1994)
produced by Ford of Australia alongside its Ford Capri counterpart and the Ford Falcon
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Mercury Capri
Wikipedia
  • Third generation (1991-1994)
    The base trim was equipped with a 100 hp Mazda 1.6 L DOHC inline-4; the XR2 was equipped with a turbocharged version of the 1.6 L engine, rated at 132 hp
  • Year: Third generation (1991-1994)
    The base trim was equipped with a 100 hp Mazda 1.6 L DOHC inline-4; the XR2 was equipped with a turbocharged version of the 1.6 L engine, rated at 132 hp
  • Lead paragraph, manufacturer
    marketed by the Lincoln-Mercury division of Ford Motor Company
  • Third generation (1991-1994), passage 2
    From 1991 to 1993, the Capri was sold with minimal revisions
  • Body style, convertible: Third generation (1991-1994)
    the Capri was released as a two-door roadster
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.