Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

1991 Ford Taurus

Automobiles

The SHO was produced through 1991, the last year of the first generation, and a redesigned Taurus and SHO were to follow for 1992. The Japanese Autorama dealerships sold the Taurus LX and SHO with left hand drive until 1991, when the first generation's run in Japan ended. In early 1991 the 2.5 liter HSC four cylinder and the three speed automatic were dropped on the second generation's introduction.

Facts
Year
1991 1
Propulsion
Petrol 3
Engine Class
Piston 3
Comparison
Body Style
Sedan 1
Body Style
Station Wagon 2
Connections

Exemplifies

Followed By

Model Year Of

Of Make

Preceded By

In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Wikipedia: Ford TaurusLead paragraph, manufacturertier 2
Quote, Lead paragraph, manufacturer
manufactured and marketed by the Ford Motor Company in the United States from 1985 to 2019
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Ford Taurus (first generation)
Wikipedia
  • Ford Taurus SHO, production end
    The variant was produced through 1991
  • Year: Ford Taurus SHO, production end
    The variant was produced through 1991
  • Reception, Japan
    with left-hand driving positions until 1991
  • Body style, sedan: Models and engines, sedan
    At its launch, the Taurus was available in four models
View the Source
2. Wikipedia: Ford Taurus
Wikipedia
  • Lead paragraph, manufacturer
    manufactured and marketed by the Ford Motor Company in the United States from 1985 to 2019
  • Body style, station-wagon: Lead paragraph, wagon
    with a five-door station wagon offered from 1986 to 2005
View the Source
3. U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. EPA (FuelEconomy.gov): FuelEconomy.gov vehicle record 7946: 1991 Ford Taurus
U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. EPA (FuelEconomy.gov)
  • JSON field fuelType1
    "fuelType1": "Regular Gasoline"
  • JSON field cylinders
    "cylinders": "6"
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.