Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Chrysler Imperial Parade Phaeton

Automobiles

The Chrysler Imperial Parade Phaeton was a ceremonial car of which Chrysler built three in 1952. Virgil Exner styled it, and in many ways it previewed the 100 Million Dollar styling that Chrysler Corporation introduced in 1955 on the newly separate Imperial make. It had no side windows and a light Dacron convertible top that covered only the rear compartment and retracted manually beneath the rear-hinged deck lid. Under the custom body the mechanicals were standard top-of-the-line Chrysler, with a 331 cubic inch FirePower V8, a torque converter transmission and power steering. Chrysler first called it the Chrysler Phaeton.

Facts
Year
1952 1
Engine Class
Piston 1
Units Built
3 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Source Chrysler Imperial Parade Phaeton (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Chrysler Imperial Parade Phaeton (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Chrysler Imperial Parade Phaeton (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturer
Quote, Lead, manufacturer
Three Chrysler Imperial Parade Phaetons were produced in 1952 by Chrysler as ceremonial vehicles
Sources
1. Chrysler Imperial Parade Phaeton (Wikipedia)
  • Lead, year
    were produced in 1952 by Chrysler as ceremonial vehicles
  • Engine section, engine class
    a 331 cubic inch (5.42 L) FirePower V8 engine
  • Lead, units-built
    Three cars were built
  • Lead, manufacturer
    Three Chrysler Imperial Parade Phaetons were produced in 1952 by Chrysler as ceremonial vehicles
  • Of Make: Chrysler, Lead, make
    Three Chrysler Imperial Parade Phaetons were produced in 1952 by Chrysler as ceremonial vehicles
  • In Group: Convertibles and Roadsters, Lead, vehicle type
    a lightweight Dacron convertible top covered only the rear compartment
  • Exemplifies: Automobile Transport, Lead, mode
    Three Chrysler Imperial Parade Phaetons were produced in 1952 by Chrysler as ceremonial vehicles
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.