Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Martin X-24

Supersonic and Experimental Aircraft

The Martin X-24 was an American experimental lifting-body aircraft built by the Martin Marietta Corporation for NASA and the United States Air Force, flown in two principal configurations, the rounded X-24A and the later, more slender X-24B, during the late 1960s and 1970s. Lacking conventional wings, the lifting body generated aerodynamic lift primarily from the shape of its own fuselage, testing a concept for a reusable spacecraft that could re-enter the atmosphere and then glide to a conventional runway landing rather than descending under a parachute. The aircraft was typically carried aloft and air-launched from a modified B-52 bomber, and the research it produced fed directly into the aerodynamic design of the later Space Shuttle orbiter.

Facts
Year
1969 1
Significance
Designed and built to test lifting body concepts, experimenting with unpowered reentry and landing later used by the Space Shuttle 1
Manufacturer or Builder
Martin Marietta 1
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Sources
1. Martin Marietta X-24, Wikipedia
  • Article body, paragraph on the SV-5P built by Martin Marietta
    The X-24 (Model SV-5P) was built by Martin Marietta and flown from Edwards.
  • Design and development
    It made its first, unpowered, glide flight on April 17, 1969 with Air Force Maj. Jerauld R. Gentry at the controls.
  • Lead, second sentence
    It was designed and built to test lifting body concepts, experimenting with the concept of unpowered reentry and landing, later used by the Space Shuttle.
  • In Group: Experimental Jet Research Aircraft, Lead sentence
    The Martin Marietta X-24 is an American experimental aircraft developed from a joint United States Air Force-NASA program named PILOT (1963-1975).
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.