Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

EMD GP39

Diesel and Electric Locomotives

The EMD GP39 is a four-axle diesel-electric locomotive built by General Motors Electro-Motive Division between June 1969 and July 1970, a derivative of the GP38 with a turbocharged EMD 645E3 12-cylinder engine generating 2,300 horsepower. Only 23 were built for American railroads, 20 of them for the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway, and it was not a popular locomotive. EMD revisited the idea of a turbocharged GP38 in 1974 with the GP39-2. Variants included two GP39DC units for Kennecott Copper and six GP39X units for the Southern Railway.

Facts
Year
1969 1
Propulsion
Diesel 1
Status
Out of production 1
Power (kW)
1715 1
Units Built
23 1
Engine
EMD 645E3 12-cylinder 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Rail Transport, Modes
Source EMD GP39 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source EMD GP39 (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. EMD GP39 (Wikipedia)
  • Production dates
    between June 1969 and July 1970
  • Power output
    which generated 2,300 hp (1.72 MW)
  • Units built
    23 examples of this locomotive model were built for American railroads
  • Prime mover
    turbocharged EMD 645E3 12-cylinder engine
  • End of production
    between June 1969 and July 1970
  • Lead, locomotive type
    is a 4-axle diesel-electric locomotive built by General Motors Electro-Motive Division between June 1969 and July 1970
  • Lead, builder
    is a 4-axle diesel-electric locomotive built by General Motors Electro-Motive Division between June 1969 and July 1970
  • Exemplifies: Rail Transport, Lead, locomotive
    is a 4-axle diesel-electric locomotive built by General Motors Electro-Motive Division between June 1969 and July 1970
  • In Group: American Diesel-Electric Road Locomotives, Lead, road locomotive
    is a 4-axle diesel-electric locomotive built by General Motors Electro-Motive Division between June 1969 and July 1970
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.