The London Underground 1938 Stock is a tube stock design of which 1,121 cars were built by Metro-Cammell and Birmingham RC&W, with 173 more cars added to the fleet by the end of 1953, including 91 new builds known as the 1949 Tube Stock. It was used on the London Underground until 1988 and worked on the Bakerloo, Northern, Piccadilly, East London, Central and Northern City lines. The trains were a major technical advance because all the electrical equipment was located under the floor for the first time, whereas earlier tube stock had large equipment compartments behind the driving cabs that cut the space for passengers by about a third. Ten sets were refurbished and ran on the Isle of Wight as Class 483 until January 2021.
Facts
Connections
Exemplifies
Source London Underground 1938 Stock (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source London Underground 1938 Stock (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source London Underground 1938 Stock (Wikipedia)BuilderQuote, Builder
A total of 1,121 cars were built by Metro-Cammell and Birmingham RC&W.
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source London Underground 1938 Stock (Wikipedia)Place of build or useQuote, Place of build or use
The London Underground 1938 Stock is a London Underground tube stock design.
Sources
1. London Underground 1938 Stock (Wikipedia)
Lead, body style
The London Underground 1938 Stock is a London Underground tube stock design.
Status
the stock was used on the London Underground until 1988
Builder
A total of 1,121 cars were built by Metro-Cammell and Birmingham RC&W.
Place of build or use
The London Underground 1938 Stock is a London Underground tube stock design.
In Group: Multiple Unit Trains, Lead, kind of vehicle
The London Underground 1938 Stock is a London Underground tube stock design.
Exemplifies: Rapid Transit, Lead, mode
The London Underground 1938 Stock is a London Underground tube stock design.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.