Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Blériot-SPAD S.64

Pioneer and Early Aviation Aircraft

The Blériot-SPAD S.64 was a French two-seat, single-engine biplane flight training aircraft designed in the 1920s. The S.64 was a biplane of wood and canvas construction. The specification lists a crew of two, a length of 7.25 m, a wingspan of 8.96 m, a height of 2.84 m and a wing area of 23.52 square metres. Its empty weight was 511 kg and its gross weight 761 kg, and a single Le Rhône 9C nine-cylinder air-cooled rotary piston engine of 60 kW gave it a maximum speed of 130 km/h. The article gives no service history, no operators and no production figure for the type.

Facts
Engine Class
Piston 1
Power (kW)
60 1
Top Speed (km/h)
130 1
Mass (kg)
511 1
Maximum Mass (kg)
761 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Blériot-SPAD S.64 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Blériot-SPAD S.64 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Blériot-SPAD S.64 (Wikipedia)Lead
Quote, Lead
The Blériot-SPAD S.64 was a French two-seat, single-engine biplane flight training aircraft designed in the 1920s.

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Blériot-SPAD S.64 (Wikipedia)Lead
Quote, Lead
The Blériot-SPAD S.64 was a French two-seat, single-engine biplane flight training aircraft designed in the 1920s.
Sources
1. Blériot-SPAD S.64 (Wikipedia)
  • Specifications
    Empty weight: 511 kg (1,127 lb)
  • Specifications, maximum mass
    Gross weight: 761 kg (1,678 lb)
  • Specifications, top speed
    Maximum speed: 130 km/h (81 mph, 70 kn)
  • Specifications, powerplant
    Le Rhône 9C 9-cylinder air-cooled rotary piston engine, 60 kW (80 hp)
  • Lead
    The Blériot-SPAD S.64 was a French two-seat, single-engine biplane flight training aircraft designed in the 1920s.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.