The Albatros C.II was a 1916 German military pusher biplane designed and built by Albatros Flugzeugwerke. Only one prototype was built and the type did not enter production. It used the wings and landing gear of the earlier C.I but replaced the conventional fuselage with a short nacelle holding a 150 hp Benz Bz.III engine in a pusher layout with a two-bladed propeller. The observer and gunner sat in an open cockpit at the front and the pilot behind. The tail was an open frame with a conventional fin and rudder and was nicknamed the Gitterschwanz, the lattice tail. It should not be confused with the OAW C.II, an unrelated tractor aircraft built the same year by the subsidiary Ostdeutsche Albatroswerke at Schneidemühl.
Facts
Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Albatros C.II (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Albatros C.II (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Albatros C.II (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
designed and built by Albatros Flugzeugwerke
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Albatros C.II (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
designed and built by Albatros Flugzeugwerke
Sources
1. Albatros C.II (Wikipedia)
Lead
was a 1916 German military pusher biplane designed and built by Albatros Flugzeugwerke
Lead and history
was a 1916 German military pusher biplane
Lead and design
Only one prototype was built and the type did not enter production
Lead, manufacturer
designed and built by Albatros Flugzeugwerke
Of Make: Albatros, Lead, make
designed and built by Albatros Flugzeugwerke
In Group: First World War Bombers and Two-Seaters, Lead, group
was a 1916 German military pusher biplane designed and built by Albatros Flugzeugwerke
Exemplifies: Aviation, Lead, mode
was a 1916 German military pusher biplane designed and built by Albatros Flugzeugwerke
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.