The Consolidated XPB3Y was a proposed extra-long-range flying boat for patrol and bombardment missions, developed from the earlier PB2Y Coronado. The United States Navy ordered the construction of a prototype on 2 April 1942, but on 4 November of the same year the aircraft was cancelled because other Consolidated projects were given higher priority. The February 1942 proposal described a flying boat about 104 feet long with a 169 foot wingspan and a gross weight of 121,500 lb, powered by four 2,450 hp Pratt & Whitney R-2800-18W radial piston engines for a maximum speed of 241 mph and a service ceiling of 22,500 ft. Armament was to be two 20 mm guns, ten .50 caliber machine guns and ten tons of bombs. No aircraft was ever completed.
Facts
Engine Class Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Consolidated XPB3Y (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Consolidated XPB3Y (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Consolidated XPB3Y (Wikipedia)Article textQuote, Article text
The Consolidated XPB3Y was a proposed extra-long-range flying boat
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Consolidated XPB3Y (Wikipedia)Article text, country of originQuote, Article text, country of origin
The United States Navy ordered the construction of a prototype on April 2, 1942.
Sources
1. Consolidated XPB3Y (Wikipedia)
Lead
The United States Navy ordered the construction of a prototype on April 2, 1942.
Lead, body style
was a proposed extra-long-range flying boat for patrol and bombardment missions
Specifications (February 1942 proposal)
Pratt & Whitney R-2800-18W radial piston engines
Lead, status
the aircraft was cancelled due to the higher priority accorded to other Consolidated projects
Article text
The Consolidated XPB3Y was a proposed extra-long-range flying boat
Article text, country of origin
The United States Navy ordered the construction of a prototype on April 2, 1942.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.