The BMW R51/3 was BMW's second post-World War II 500 cc motorcycle, following the briefly produced R51/2, and it featured a flat-twin engine and an exposed drive shaft. In 1951 it succeeded and modernised the 1950 R51/2, which was essentially a pre-war design built after the war, and it stayed in production for four years. After the war the Allies had barred Germany from making motorcycles, and when the ban was lifted in Western Germany BMW had to start from scratch with no plans or blueprints, using surviving pre-war motorcycles to draw new ones; the first postwar machine was the 250 cc R24 of 1948, essentially a pre-war R23 with a rigid rear end. The 600 cc R67 series, a near identical sister model, and the more sporting R68 followed alongside it.
Facts
Engine Class Connections
Exemplifies
Source BMW R51/3 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source BMW R51/3 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source BMW R51/3 (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
The BMW R51/3 was BMW's second post-World War II 500 cc motorcycle, following the briefly produced R51/2.
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Wikipedia: BMW (manufacturer)Leadtier 2Quote, Lead
is a German multinational conglomerate manufacturer of luxury vehicles and motorcycles headquartered in Munich, Germany.
Sources
1. BMW R51/3 (Wikipedia)
Lead
In 1951, the R51/3 succeeded and modernized the 1950 R51/2
History, production run
The R51/3 was then introduced in 1951 for a production run of four years.
Lead, engine
It featured a flat-twin engine and exposed drive shaft.
Lead, manufacturer
The BMW R51/3 was BMW's second post-World War II 500 cc motorcycle, following the briefly produced R51/2.
View the SourceWikipedia: BMW (manufacturer)
WikipediaLeadQuote, Lead
is a German multinational conglomerate manufacturer of luxury vehicles and motorcycles headquartered in Munich, Germany.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.