The Yakovlev Yak-100, first designated Yak-22, was a single-engine transport helicopter developed in the USSR in 1948 and the Yakovlev bureau's second helicopter. It was built in direct competition with Mikhail Mil's Mi-1 and strongly resembled the Sikorsky H-5, with a conventional main and tail rotor driven by an Ivchenko AI-26GRFL radial piston engine and a long greenhouse canopy giving good visibility. Vibration was tackled by moving the rotor blade centre of gravity behind the flexural axis. Manufacturer trials ended in June 1950 and state trials succeeded, but the Mi-1 was already in production, so the Yak-100 was not produced.
Facts
Engine Class Connections
Exemplifies
Source Yakovlev Yak-100 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Yakovlev Yak-100 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Yakovlev Yak-100 (Wikipedia)Lead, makerQuote, Lead, maker
was a single-engine transport helicopter developed in the USSR in 1948
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Yakovlev Yak-100 (Wikipedia)Lead, country of originQuote, Lead, country of origin
was a single-engine transport helicopter developed in the USSR in 1948
Sources
1. Yakovlev Yak-100 (Wikipedia)
Lead, body style
was a single-engine transport helicopter developed in the USSR in 1948
Lead, development year
developed in the USSR in 1948
Design and development, status
the Yak-100 was not put into production
Design and development, engine
Ivchenko AI-26GRFL radial piston engine
Lead, maker
was a single-engine transport helicopter developed in the USSR in 1948
Lead, country of origin
was a single-engine transport helicopter developed in the USSR in 1948
In Group: Military Transport and Utility Helicopters, Lead, kind of aircraft
was a single-engine transport helicopter developed in the USSR in 1948
Exemplifies: Aviation, Lead, mode
was a single-engine transport helicopter developed in the USSR in 1948
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.