The Bell D-292 was an experimental helicopter built in the United States by Bell Helicopter for the Army Advanced Composite Airframe Program, known as ACAP, which supported studies for the Light Helicopter Experimental program. The programme aimed to show that an all-composite fuselage could be lighter and cheaper to build than a largely metal airframe. Bell reused the engines, transmission, two-bladed main and tail rotors, tailboom, vertical fin and rotor pylon of its Bell 222 and fitted a new airframe made from graphite, Kevlar, fiberglass, epoxy and polyimides, with the fuselage produced in two halves to reduce the number of major assemblies. Contracts went to Sikorsky and Bell in February 1981, and the D-292 flew for the first time on 30 August 1985 after delays caused by funding and industrial problems.
Facts
Connections
Exemplifies
Source Bell D-292 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Bell D-292 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Bell D-292 (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The Bell D-292 was an American experimental helicopter developed by Bell Helicopters for the United States Army Advanced Composite Airframe Program (ACAP), as part of the studies involved in the Light Helicopter Experimental (LHX) program.
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Bell D-292 (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The Bell D-292 was an American experimental helicopter developed by Bell Helicopters for the United States Army Advanced Composite Airframe Program (ACAP), as part of the studies involved in the Light Helicopter Experimental (LHX) program.
Sources
1. Bell D-292 (Wikipedia)
Lead
The Bell D-292 was an American experimental helicopter developed by Bell Helicopters for the United States Army Advanced Composite Airframe Program (ACAP), as part of the studies involved in the Light Helicopter Experimental (LHX) program.
Design and development, first flight
flew for the first time on 30 August 1985
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.