Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Kawasaki KAT-1

General Aviation and Light Aircraft

The Kawasaki KAT-1 was a Japanese primary trainer with two seats in tandem, designed in the mid-1950s to compete for a Japan Air Defense Force contract against the Fuji-built Beech Model 45 Mentor. It was a cantilever low-wing monoplane of metal construction with fabric-covered control surfaces, hydraulic split flaps and a retractable tricycle undercarriage. A 240 horsepower Lycoming GO-435 flat-six engine in the nose drove a two-blade variable-pitch propeller, and student and instructor sat under individual sliding canopy sections. It shared much of its layout and many components with the five-seat Kawasaki KAL-2. Only two prototypes were completed. The Beech Mentor won the contract, and the first prototype went on to serve with the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force; it is now displayed at the Kakamigahara Aerospace Museum.

Facts
Engine Class
Piston 1
Status
Cancelled 1
Units Built
2 1
Top Speed (km/h)
303 1
Mass (kg)
1070 1
Maximum Mass (kg)
1385 1
Engine
Lycoming GO-435 flat-six engine, 179 kW (240 hp) 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Kawasaki KAT-1 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Kawasaki KAT-1 (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Kawasaki KAT-1 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    The Kawasaki KAT-1 is a Japanese primary trainer, seating two in tandem
  • Design and development
    240 hp (179 kW) Lycoming GO-435 flat-six engine installed in the nose
  • Operational history
    the Beech Mentor was chosen in preference by the JADF as its primary trainer
  • Lead, units built
    Only two were completed.
  • Specifications
    Empty weight: 1,070 kg (2,359 lb)
  • Specifications, maximum mass
    Gross weight: 1,385 kg (3,053 lb)
  • Specifications, top speed
    Maximum speed: 303 km/h (188 mph, 164 kn) at sea level
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.