Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

De Havilland DH.94 Moth Minor

General Aviation and Light Aircraft

The de Havilland DH.94 Moth Minor was a British two-seat tourer and trainer of the late 1930s, built by de Havilland at Hatfield Aerodrome. It was designed as a low-wing monoplane to replace the biplane Moth series, with similar performance from less power and without the rigging of a biplane's tensioners and struts; its predecessor was the one-off DH.81 Swallow Moth monoplane of 1931. Geoffrey de Havilland first flew the wooden prototype at Hatfield on 22 June 1937, and production followed, with nearly 100 built by the outbreak of the Second World War. When the war began, production moved to de Havilland Australia at Bankstown Aerodrome, where components and unfinished aircraft were shipped and more than 40 were produced. An experimental variant with a tricycle landing gear and a canopy over the rear seat was first flown on 29 April 1940.

Facts
Year
1937 1
Engine Class
Piston 1
Top Speed (km/h)
190 1
Mass (kg)
446 1
Maximum Mass (kg)
703 1
Engine
de Havilland Gipsy Minor 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source De Havilland DH.94 Moth Minor (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source De Havilland DH.94 Moth Minor (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. De Havilland DH.94 Moth Minor (Wikipedia)
  • Design and development, prototype
    The wooden prototype of the DH.94 was first flown by Geoffrey de Havilland on 22 June 1937
  • Specifications, powerplant
    Powerplant: 1 × de Havilland Gipsy Minor 4-cylinder inverted air-cooled in-line piston engine, 90 hp (67 kW)
  • Specifications, empty weight
    Empty weight: 983 lb (446 kg)
  • Specifications, maximum weight
    Max takeoff weight: 1,550 lb (703 kg)
  • Specifications, maximum speed
    Maximum speed: 118 mph (190 km/h, 103 kn)
  • Lead
    built by de Havilland at Hatfield Aerodrome, England
  • Lead, country of origin
    was a 1930s British two-seat tourer/trainer aircraft
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.