The Aeronca L is a 1930s American cabin monoplane designed and built, in small numbers, by Aeronca Aircraft. It differed significantly from other Aeronca planes in using radial engines, streamlining and a cantilever low wing, with side-by-side seating in a completely enclosed cabin, large wheel spats on the fixed undercarriage and a Townend ring on the engine. Aeronca's own engines proved inadequate, so the company turned to small radial engines from other suppliers, particularly the neighbouring Cincinnati maker LeBlond, and the variants LA to LD used LeBlond, Warner Scarab Junior and Lambert engines. The plane was not a big seller, and engine supply problems and the destructive 1937 flood at Lunken Airport led Aeronca back to high-wing light aircraft.
Facts
Engine Class Maximum Mass (kg) Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Aeronca L (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Aeronca L (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Aeronca L (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
The Aeronca L is a 1930s American cabin monoplane designed and built, in small numbers, by Aeronca Aircraft.
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Aeronca L (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
The Aeronca L is a 1930s American cabin monoplane designed and built, in small numbers, by Aeronca Aircraft.
Sources
1. Aeronca L (Wikipedia)
Lead
The Aeronca L is a 1930s American cabin monoplane
Specifications
Warner Scarab Junior 5-cylinder air-cooled radial piston engine, 90 hp (67 kW)
Lead, status
Aeronca went back to high-wing light aircraft.
Specifications, mass
Empty weight: 1,034 lb (469 kg)
Specifications, maximum mass
Gross weight: 1,680 lb (762 kg)
Specifications, power
90 hp (67 kW)
Lead, manufacturer
The Aeronca L is a 1930s American cabin monoplane designed and built, in small numbers, by Aeronca Aircraft.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.