The Raleigh Chopper Mk 2 was the improved version of the Raleigh Chopper, sold from 1972 and kept in production until 1983, by which time the BMX craze had taken over its market. Compared with the Mk 1 it had a shorter seat, which shifted the rider's weight forward and helped to stop the front of the bicycle lifting. It also gained a small rear rack, handlebars welded to the stem so that children could not tilt the ape-hanger bars backwards, and a T-bar style gear shifter. The 1973 to 1974 Pinky model offered an optional five-speed derailleur. Variants included the drop-handlebar Sprint GT of 1972 to 1973 and a special edition with cast alloy wheels that marked 750,000 Choppers built. It is the second generation of the Raleigh Chopper.
Facts
Connections
Exemplifies
Generation Of
Source Wikipedia: Raleigh Chopper
Of Make
Source Wikipedia: Raleigh Chopper
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Wikipedia: Raleigh ChopperLeadtier 2Quote, Lead
The Raleigh Chopper is a bicycle for children and young adults, manufactured and marketed by the Raleigh Bicycle Company of Nottingham, England.
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Raleigh Bicycle Company (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The Raleigh Bicycle Company is a British bicycle brand based in Nottingham, England
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Raleigh Chopper
WikipediaMk 2
The Mk 2 ("Mark 2") Chopper was an improved version sold from 1972.
Lead
The Raleigh Chopper is a bicycle for children and young adults, manufactured and marketed by the Raleigh Bicycle Company of Nottingham, England.
Mk 2, status
The Chopper Mk 2 remained in production until 1983, by which time the BMX craze had taken over its market.
View the Source Raleigh Chopper: The definitive history and collectors' guide (Retrowow)
Raleigh Bicycle Company (Wikipedia)
LeadQuote, Lead
The Raleigh Bicycle Company is a British bicycle brand based in Nottingham, England
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.