The Ginetta G7 is one of the numbered Ginetta projects of the 1960s that never reached series production. The Ginetta Owners Club model index lists it as a sports racer of G4 type with a rear mounted transaxle and independent rear suspension, and records it as a prototype only. The club timeline, however, notes under September 1963 that a DKW engined G7 project was abandoned, so the two accounts do not agree on whether the G7 name belonged to a DKW project of 1963 or to a later rear transaxle design, and the Ginetta Owners Club of Switzerland dates its entry 1967. No engine, price or production figure is recorded for it, and it should not be confused with the G4 based road cars that were built in numbers.
Facts
Connections
Exemplifies
Source G7 (Ginetta Owners Club)
Of Make
Source Ginetta Owners Club: History and Timeline (Ginetta Owners Club)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Ginetta Owners Club: History and Timeline (Ginetta Owners Club)TimelineQuote, Timeline
September 1963 DKW-engined G7 project abandoned
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Ginetta Owners Club: History and Timeline (Ginetta Owners Club)History, foundingQuote, History, founding
Ginetta was founded in 1958 by four Walklett brothers (Bob, Ivor, Trevers and Douglas) in Woodbridge, Suffolk.
Sources
1. Ginetta Owners Club of Switzerland: Ginetta G7
Ginetta Owners Club of SwitzerlandSpecifications, year
Year 1967
Specifications, type
Types Sports Racer
View the Source 2. G7 (Ginetta Owners Club)
Model details
Appearance - Sports racer G4 Type
Model details, status
Production - Prototype only
View the SourceGinetta Owners Club: History and Timeline (Ginetta Owners Club)
Ginetta Owners ClubTimeline
September 1963 DKW-engined G7 project abandoned
History, founding
Ginetta was founded in 1958 by four Walklett brothers (Bob, Ivor, Trevers and Douglas) in Woodbridge, Suffolk.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.