Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

De Havilland DH.89 Dragon Rapide

Airliners and Commercial Jet Aircraft

The de Havilland DH.89 Dragon Rapide was a 1930s short-haul biplane airliner, carrying six to eight passengers, that the British company de Havilland developed as a faster and more comfortable successor to the DH.84 Dragon. It was in effect a twin-engined, scaled-down version of the four-engined DH.86 Express, sharing its tapered wings, streamlined fairings and Gipsy Six engines, and it was first marketed as the Dragon Six before the name Dragon Rapide, and later simply Rapide, took hold. The prototype flew at Hatfield on 17 April 1934, and series production was in full swing by November of that year, with 205 built for airlines and private owners before the war. In wartime service with the Royal Air Force and Royal Navy it was called the Dominie, used for radio and navigation training, transport and communications, and the de Havilland Dove replaced it after the war.

Facts
Year
1934 1
Engine Class
Piston 1
Top Speed (km/h)
253 1
Mass (kg)
1465 1
Maximum Mass (kg)
2495 1
Engine
de Havilland Gipsy Six 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source De Havilland DH.89 Dragon Rapide (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source De Havilland DH.89 Dragon Rapide (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. De Havilland DH.89 Dragon Rapide (Wikipedia)
  • Design and development, prototype
    On 17 April 1934, the prototype conducted its maiden flight at Hatfield Aerodrome, Hertfordshire.
  • Specifications, powerplant
    Powerplant: 2 × de Havilland Gipsy Six 6-cylinder air-cooled inverted in-line piston engines, 200 hp (150 kW)
  • Specifications, empty weight
    Empty weight: 3,230 lb (1,465 kg)
  • Specifications, gross weight
    Gross weight: 5,500 lb (2,495 kg)
  • Specifications, maximum speed
    Maximum speed: 157 mph (253 km/h, 136 kn)
  • Lead
    is a 1930s short-haul biplane airliner developed and produced by British aircraft company de Havilland
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.