The Convair CV-640 was a turboprop conversion of the later Convairliner models, made from a Convair CV-340 or CV-440 by fitting Rolls-Royce Dart turboprop engines with four-blade propellers in place of the piston engines and their three-blade propellers. It paralleled the CV-600, which gave the same Dart engines to the earlier CV-240, and as with the CV-600 the conversions were performed by Convair rather than by an outside company. The type was still flying long after the piston Convairliners had left main-line service: in 2012 a total of seven Convair CV-640 aircraft remained in airline service, one with Rhoades Aviation and six with C&M Airways. It sits beside the Napier Eland CV-540 and the Allison-powered CV-580 among the turboprop re-engining programmes applied to the Convairliner family.
Facts
Engine Class Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Convair CV-240 family (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Convair CV-240 family (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Convair CV-240 family (Wikipedia)Variants, Convair CV-640, manufacturerQuote, Variants, Convair CV-640, manufacturer
The conversions were performed by Convair.
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Convair CV-240 family (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The Convair CV-240 is an American airliner that Convair manufactured from 1947 to 1954
Sources
1. Convair CV-240 family (Wikipedia)
Variants, Convair CV-640
with Rolls-Royce Dart turboprop engines with four-blade propellers
Variants, Convair CV-640, status
In 2012, a total of seven Convair CV-640 aircraft remained in airline service
Variants, Convair CV-640, body style
a total of seven Convair CV-640 aircraft remained in airline service
Variants, Convair CV-640, manufacturer
The conversions were performed by Convair.
Lead
The Convair CV-240 is an American airliner that Convair manufactured from 1947 to 1954
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.