Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Engine

General Electric J73

Aircraft Engines

The General Electric J73 is a turbojet developed by General Electric from the earlier J47 engine. Its original United States Air Force designation was J47-21, but variable inlet guide vanes, a double-shell combustor case and 50 percent greater airflow led to the new J73 designation. To raise airflow the accessories were moved from the centre of the compressor inlet to the underside, the combustion area was enlarged into a cannular arrangement with a two stage turbine, and a low boost tailpipe augmentation afterburner was fitted. Its only operational use was in the North American F-86H Sabre, with the J73-GE-3 rated at 9,200 pounds-force. Four J73 engines were also converted in 1957 to use heat from a nuclear reactor in place of jet fuel, and were tested at the Atomic Energy Commission national reactor testing station.

Facts
Classification
Fuel or Cycle
Jet Fuel / Turbine 1
Displacement or Thrust
9,200 lbf (40.92 kN) for the J73-GE-3 1
Connections

Of Make

Source General Electric J73 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source General Electric J73 (Wikipedia)Lead, maker
Quote, Lead, maker
turbojet was developed by General Electric from the earlier J47 engine
Sources
1. General Electric J73 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead, engine kind, cycle
    turbojet was developed by General Electric from the earlier J47 engine
  • Variants, J73-GE-3 thrust
    9,200 lbf (40.92 kN) for the North American F-86H Sabre
  • Lead, maker
    turbojet was developed by General Electric from the earlier J47 engine
  • In Group: Turbojet and Turbofan Engines, Lead, engine kind
    turbojet was developed by General Electric from the earlier J47 engine
  • Part Of: North American F-86 Sabre, Lead, application
    Its only operational use was in the North American F-86H
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.