Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Gloster E.1/44

Military Aircraft

The Gloster E.1/44 was a British single-engined jet fighter design of the Second World War era, built by Gloster as an experimental aircraft to Air Ministry Specification E.1/44 around the Rolls-Royce Nene turbojet. It was a stressed-skin, mid-winged monoplane with a broad fuselage, air intakes ahead of the wing roots and a tricycle undercarriage, quite unlike the twin-jet Meteor. Progress was slow because Gloster concentrated on the Meteor; the first prototype was destroyed in a road accident, and the second made the first flight at RAF Boscombe Down on 9 March 1948. Test pilot Bill Waterton disliked its handling and power, the programme ended in 1949, and its revised tail was reused on the Meteor F 8.

Facts
Year
1948 1
Engine Class
Jet 1
Status
Cancelled 1
Top Speed (km/h)
998 1
Mass (kg)
3747 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Gloster E.1/44 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Gloster E.1/44 (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Gloster E.1/44 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead, first flight
    On 9 March 1948, the second E.1/44 performed its maiden flight at RAF Boscombe Down.
  • Lead, aircraft
    British single-engined jet fighter design
  • Specifications, powerplant
    Powerplant: 1 × Rolls-Royce Nene II centrifugal flow turbojet
  • Construction and testing, end of the programme
    This comparison was a major factor in the termination of the test programme during 1949
  • Specifications, maximum speed
    Maximum speed: 620 mph (1,000 km/h, 540 kn)
  • Specifications, empty weight
    Empty weight: 8,260 lb (3,747 kg)
  • Lead and development, maker
    developed and produced by the British aviation firm Gloster Aircraft Company
  • Lead, British aircraft
    The Gloster E.1/44 was a British single-engined jet fighter design of the Second World War
  • In Group: Jet Fighters and Interceptors, Lead, aircraft role
    British single-engined jet fighter design
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.