Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Bell D-188A

Military Aircraft

The Bell D-188A was a proposed eight-engine, Mach 2 capable vertical take-off and landing tiltjet fighter that never proceeded past the mock-up stage. In 1955 the USAF and the US Navy both asked Bell Aircraft to develop a supersonic all-weather fighter-bomber and interceptor, designated the Model 2000 and offered as the D-188 for the Navy and the D-188A for the Air Force. Four General Electric J85 engines sat in wing pods that rotated to direct thrust downward for takeoff, and four more engines were in the fuselage, two of them vertical liftjets. Bell showed the design publicly on 5 December 1960 as the XF-109, although that designation was never officially assigned, and in spring 1961 the Air Force cancelled the program with no aircraft built.

Facts
Year
1960 1
Engine Class
Jet 1
Status
Design only (never built) 1
Mass (kg)
6260 1
Engine
Eight General Electric J85-GE-5 turbojets 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Of Make

Source Bell D-188A (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Bell D-188A (Wikipedia)
  • Lead, public showing
    On 5 December 1960, Bell publicly showed off the design as the XF-109
  • Specifications, empty weight
    Empty weight: 13,800 lb (6,260 kg)
  • Specifications, powerplant
    Powerplant: 8 × General Electric J85-GE-5 turbojets, 2,600 lbf (12 kN) thrust each
  • Lead, aircraft description
    The Bell D-188A (unofficial military designations XF-109/XF3L) was a proposed eight-engine Mach 2
  • Lead, design status
    never proceeded past the mock-up stage
  • Lead, builder
    In 1955, Bell Aircraft was requested by both the USAF and the US Navy to develop a VTOL/STOVL supersonic, all-weather fighter-bomber and defence interceptor.
  • In Group: Jet Fighters and Interceptors, Lead, role of the aircraft
    The Bell D-188A (unofficial military designations XF-109/XF3L) was a proposed eight-engine Mach 2-capable vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) tiltjet fighter that never proceeded past the mock-up stage.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.