Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Messerschmitt P.1079

Military Aircraft

The Messerschmitt P.1079 was a series of pulsejet-powered fighter projects begun in May 1941, after it became clear that the BMW turbojets planned for the Me 262 were not yet available and that pulsejets, the type used in the V-1 flying bomb, were simpler and cheaper to build. The variants, including the P.1079/1, /2, /10c, /13b, /15 and /16, were all small aircraft with retractable landing skids, powered by one or two Argus-Schmidt SR 500 or Schmidt pulsejets. The pulsejets produced too little power at low speed for an unassisted take-off, so towplanes, catapults or rocket boosters would have been needed, which defeated the purpose of the program. A so-called P.1079 18 Schwalbe that appears in some publications is a widely publicized hoax and not a real Messerschmitt project.

Facts
Year
1941 1
Engine Class
Pulsejet 1
Status
Design only (never built) 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Messerschmitt P.1079 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Messerschmitt P.1079 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Messerschmitt P.1079 (Wikipedia)Lead, maker
Quote, Lead, maker
The Messerschmitt P.1079 was a series of pulsejet-powered Messerschmitt fighter projects during the Second World War.
Sources
1. Messerschmitt P.1079 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    pulsejet-powered Messerschmitt fighter projects
  • History
    In May 1941, Messerschmitt began work on a series of pulsejet-powered fighter designs under the designation P.1079
  • Lead, engine class
    The P.1079 aircraft designs were to be powered by pulse jets, the same engines used in the V-1 flying bomb.
  • Lead, maker
    The Messerschmitt P.1079 was a series of pulsejet-powered Messerschmitt fighter projects during the Second World War.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.