Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Focke-Wulf Project III

Military Aircraft

The Focke-Wulf Project III was a German design study for a jet fighter, worked out by Focke-Wulf in June 1943 as a follow-up to the Project II. Its aim was to reduce the danger of foreign objects being drawn into the engine, a risk foreseen for the Project II with its low underslung intake. To do this the designers moved the turbojet from beneath the fuselage to a position on top of it, with the jet intakes at the sides of the fuselage. In most other respects the layout resembled the Project II, but the conventional tail was replaced by twin tails at the ends of the horizontal stabiliser, which gave the jet exhaust a clear path. A related Project IV was to be virtually identical but with a liquid-fuelled rocket booster on each side of the turbojet nacelle. The Project III remained a design study.

Facts
Year
1943 1
Engine Class
Jet 1
Status
Design only (never built) 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Focke-Wulf Project III (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Focke-Wulf Project III (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Focke-Wulf Project III (Wikipedia)Lead, body style
Quote, Lead, body style
The Focke-Wulf Project III was a design study for a jet fighter

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Focke-Wulf Project III (Wikipedia)Lead
Quote, Lead
carried out in Germany in June 1943
Sources
1. Focke-Wulf Project III (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    carried out in Germany in June 1943
  • Lead, body style
    The Focke-Wulf Project III was a design study for a jet fighter
  • Lead, engine class
    by relocating the engine from beneath the fuselage to a position atop the fuselage, with the jet intakes at the fuselage sides
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.