Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Martin XB-68

Supersonic and Experimental Aircraft

The Martin XB-68 was a supersonic medium tactical bomber with a crew of two, proposed in 1954 to the United States Air Force and cancelled before any aircraft was built. The Glenn L. Martin Company submitted design studies for the Weapon System 302A requirement in 1952, competing with Douglas and North American, and the Martin 316 was declared the winner in 1956 and given the designation XB-68, with deployment projected for 1962 to 1965. It had a conventional layout resembling a scaled-up Lockheed F-104, was to be mostly of steel, and had stubby diamond-shaped wings and a raked T-tail. Serious difficulties with the inertial guidance system, then Air Force budget limits and other priorities, led headquarters to cancel the project in 1957.

Facts
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Status
Cancelled 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Martin XB-68 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Martin XB-68 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Martin XB-68 (Wikipedia)Design and development
Quote, Design and development
The Glenn L. Martin Company submitted design studies in response to the Weapon System 302A requirement in 1952

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Martin XB-68 (Wikipedia)Lead, body style
Quote, Lead, body style
was a supersonic medium tactical bomber with a crew of two that was proposed in 1954 to the United States Air Force
Sources
1. Martin XB-68 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    The project, however, was canceled before any aircraft were built.
  • Lead, body style
    was a supersonic medium tactical bomber with a crew of two that was proposed in 1954 to the United States Air Force
  • Design and development
    The Glenn L. Martin Company submitted design studies in response to the Weapon System 302A requirement in 1952
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.